Wikipedia have been attempt to organize knowledge like other encyclopedia by using disambiguations to users. At this point we can meet up with so called 'consensus'. Then we must to reach the question about 'what is consensus?' Following the definition of consensus is overwhelming agreement which does not mean unanimity. We can get some values such as inclusive, participatory, cooperative, egalitarian etc. In this reason, consensus is one of the most important factor of wikipedia which well known for openess, collective intelligence, share. Meanwhile consensus seemed contains both democracy factors and dialectic. Reaching to the goal which is well organized is the final destination of consensus, if it has other branch view point,though.
We all know that wikipedia has variety system that make consensus. Discuss on talk pages, WikiProjects, Polls are all the system what i would like to talk. It seemed that Wikiprojects has been well operated however, only a few users who are interested on that topic attend to wikiproject. To get high quality of consensus, lots of users are compulsory needed. So how can we gather people who can participate on the way of consensus?
No comments:
Post a Comment